{"id":119534,"date":"2019-05-09T12:12:16","date_gmt":"2019-05-09T10:12:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/aseryde.com\/?p=119534"},"modified":"2019-05-09T12:18:43","modified_gmt":"2019-05-09T10:18:43","slug":"el-tjue-ve-ilegal-el-calculo-de-las-pensiones-a-tiempo-parcial-por-discriminar-a-las-mujeres","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/aseryde.com\/en\/el-tjue-ve-ilegal-el-calculo-de-las-pensiones-a-tiempo-parcial-por-discriminar-a-las-mujeres\/","title":{"rendered":"The CJEU sees the calculation of part-time pensions as illegal for discriminating against women"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>[et_pb_section fb_built=\u00bb1\u2033 _builder_version=\u00bb3.20.2\u2033][et_pb_row _builder_version=\u00bb3.20.2\u2033 custom_padding=\u00bb26px|0px|26px|0px|false|false\u00bb custom_margin=\u00bb-72px||\u00bb][et_pb_column type=\u00bb4_4\u2033 _builder_version=\u00bb3.20.2\u2033][et_pb_text _builder_version=\u00bb3.20.2\u2033]<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: justify;\">The European Justice criticizes that the regulations are \u201cespecially disadvantageous\u201d for women, who in Spain make up 75% of part-time workers<\/h3>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 14px; text-align: justify;\">The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) considers that the Spanish system for calculating retirement pensions for part-time workers is illegal if it is proven that the regulations are \u201cespecially disadvantageous\u201d for women.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size: 14px; text-align: justify;\">A citizen of Castilla y Le\u00f3n challenged the calculation of the retirement pension carried out by the Social Security Institute, alleging that the difference in treatment with respect to full-time workers gives rise to indirect discrimination based on sex because the majority of part-time workers are women.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 14px; text-align: justify;\"><\/span><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: justify;\">In the hands of the Superior Court of Justice<span style=\"font-size: 14px; text-align: justify;\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The community judges leave in the hands of the Superior Court of Justice of Castilla y Le\u00f3n the decision on whether the distribution of part-time workers by sex that they have presented is \u201cvalid, representative and significant.\u201d The CJEU points out that this disadvantage exists \u201cwhen a regulation negatively affects a significantly higher proportion of people of one sex than that of people of the other sex.\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">If the Spanish court, based on this data and other relevant elements, reaches the conclusion that the regulations place women in a \u201cparticularly less advantageous position than that of men\u201d, it must rule that it is contrary to Community legislation. , &quot;unless it is objectively justified.&quot;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">When examining whether the Spanish regulations respond to a legitimate social policy purpose, the court observed that it includes two elements that can reduce the amount of retirement pensions for part-time workers. Specifically, the European Justice indicates that the first element of pension calculation, the regulatory base based on the contribution bases, is sufficient to protect a contributory Social Security system. Therefore, later applying a partiality coefficient \u201cgoes beyond what is necessary\u201d and implies a greater reduction in pensions than if only their working hours are taken into account.<\/p>\n<p>[\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][\/et_pb_section]<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The European Court of Justice criticises that the legislation is \u201cparticularly disadvantageous\u201d for women, who in Spain account for 75% of part-time workers The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) considers that the Spanish system for calculating retirement pensions for part-time workers is illegal if [\u2026]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":119538,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"on","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-119534","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-noticias"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/aseryde.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/119534","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/aseryde.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/aseryde.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/aseryde.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/aseryde.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=119534"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/aseryde.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/119534\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":119541,"href":"https:\/\/aseryde.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/119534\/revisions\/119541"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/aseryde.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/119538"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/aseryde.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=119534"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/aseryde.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=119534"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/aseryde.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=119534"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}